Collect less, choose more
Ask everyone to add only films they would watch during this window. The 30-title cap makes the list a working set, not an archive.
A watchlist with a decision at the end
Most watchlists are good at collecting ideas and bad at choosing one. This temporary room keeps a shortlist together for seven days, then uses private ranks and vetoes to make one transparent recommendation.
Ask everyone to add only films they would watch during this window. The 30-title cap makes the list a working set, not an archive.
A veto is private and specific to this room. It keeps a title from winning when one participant has a hard boundary, without turning the conversation into a debate.
The reveal gives one pick plus two backups when eligible candidates exist. If every title is vetoed, the room says so and you can add another film.
The room URL is an unguessable token, and each participant uses an anonymous browser token stored locally. The MVP does not ask for names or email addresses. Room records are designed to expire after seven days and are cleaned up by a database function scheduled by the operator.
Film metadata comes from Wikidata and results link there when a source page is available. This is a decision tool, not a streaming directory.
Not yet. This MVP is a seven-day decision room, so it is best for turning a shared shortlist into a choice rather than maintaining a long-term library.
The shortlist is bounded, ranking is private, and the room has a reveal step with a documented tie-break. Those constraints turn suggestions into a decision.
Yes. Results with a source link open the film item on Wikidata. The tool does not link to unauthorized copies or promise where a film is streaming.